Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Dolph Lundgren Could Have Played the Mad Scientist

I knew the odds were not in my favor that “Sucker Punch” would be what you’d call a “quality film.” However, I at least hoped for some marginal, bad action movie entertainment. No dice. Blogging about such a film using thoughtful analysis seems the equivalent of trying to analyze the finger painting a mentally challenged chimpanzee has done with its own feces. Therefore, instead of a critical discussion, I’ve decided to brainstorm ten ideas of how “Sucker Punch” might have been improved.

1. Instead of a tortured young woman, perhaps the character of Baby Doll is an actual baby doll, demonically come to life, or built by a mad scientist. But the mad scientist can no longer control her violent tendencies, so he must lock her away for everyone’s protection! Also, the character named Rocket should be a cyborg with rocket arms.

2. Cut the dream within a dream. There was only one filmed named “Inception,“ and you are not it, “Sucker Punch.” Baby Doll fantasizes about being trapped in a brothel, where to deal with being ogled by men, she fantasizes about fighting zombies. Dear Baby Doll: Are you really so messed up you require two dream worlds to cope with your traumatic experiences? Maybe you should try some more therapy and less attempts at vigilantism.

3. The characters in the fantasy sequences should actually have some relevance or parallel to the characters in the “real” mental institution story. For example, perhaps the dragon could have been personified by a fat, chain-smoking female guard, and the Nazi zombies could have been a troupe of rule obsessed Aryan orderlies. I mean, I love the random inclusion of dragons as much as the next nerd, but this is just sloppy storytelling.

4. Add more story and character development. It’s hard for audiences to be invested in the plight of generic female mental patients/prostitutes. Or another possibility is to have even less story and character development, and just make the film into a porno. You know, it’s practically halfway there on its own!

5. More John Hamm. He played two parts, that of a doctor giving a lobotomy and in the fantasy sequence, a mysterious rich guy in a white dinner jacket. Neither role gave him very much screen time. What a waste of Hamm!

6. More cheesy catch phrases. If you’re going to be a bad action film, at least embrace your crappiness with some memorable commentary. Such one liners might include “Lobotomize this!” or “Baby Doll wants to play!” Then cue cute blond girl punching a dude in the face. The possibilities are endless. The movie is called “Sucker Punch” for pete’s sake. There’s got to be a good pun in there somewhere.

7. Get a sense of humor. This sort of goes along with number six. This film was ripe with ridiculousness waiting to bubble through the melodramatic storylines. Point in case, Carla Gugino’s hilarious Russian accent as Dr. Vera Gorski. I’m fairly certain her character used to be eit her a communist spy or part of a family of traveling acrobats.

8. More crazy bitches being crazy bitches. The film takes place in a hospital for the criminally insane, so why the room full of mewling sad sacks? Where’s the sassy prison yard banter? Angelina Jolie had more spirit in “Girl, Interrupted,” and that was a drama, folks. All I’m asking is one chair thrown at somebody else’s head, maybe some creepy whittling while spouting gibberish death threats to a house plant. Now that’s crazy!

9. Less weasely villain. I have nothing to add on this point. This guy just looked like a creeper, and the fact that it took until the end of the film for somebody to stab him in the neck was really off-putting.

10. How about we just cut out the whole “real world” component and make this a story about five slutty friends who travel through time and space, fighting samurai, orcs, zombies, dragons, and robots. I’m sure there’s probably an anime already out there with this exact premise. Or twelve. Or twelve hundred.

3 comments:

  1. I caught Sucker Punch this weekend and had pretty good time watching it. Surprisingly, it wasn't because of the promised T&A. (Most of the girls have builds closer to athletic than buxom.) I just thought it was good fun. The action sequences I just likened to odd music videos for the featured songs. Speaking of which, I actually enjoyed the industrial covers of those older songs, too. (I was about to say that "Army of Me" wasn't that old, but it came out nearly 20 years ago!) I give the film one thumb up. Sufficient enough for me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @multimediaculture

    That's what frustrates me about a filmmaker like Zack Snyder. (I read your post on the same topic.) He is truly skilled at the visual part of the craft, but when you pair that with, what in my opinion, was a ridiculously sub-par script, it I just think what a cool movie it could have been with a real story. But look, there you went and made me get all pretentious and judgy!

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Steinho
    Yeah, Snyder is very clearly an audio-visual filmmaker - which based on words alone sounds like an alright way to be. He imagines and realizes some truly remarkable visuals and pairs them up with great soundtracks, but it's true that he has some certain shortcomings as a writer. Even with help, the story told in the script was not the best.

    Don't get me wrong, I actually liked the plot. But the dialogue was underwhelming, as was the attempt at crafting a metaphor for films themselves. I can see that clearly. Snyder and Shibuya should have employed an actual writer to put their ideas together - although the two of them have a very worthwhile background for putting the visuals together.

    Now I can't help but wonder about the rumored removed scenes that reveal what is happening in each parallel world. Will they make a difference? And at this point, with the heavy criticism lain on the film, will they matter even if they do improve the film to the supposedly critical eye? Regardless, I see this movie becoming a cult classic for non-ironic reasons.

    (Had to log in differently this time because Blogger was being unfriendly with me...)

    ReplyDelete